by

HOW CAN LEADERS ENHANCE INCLUSIVE EDUCATION USING MODERN TECHNOLOGY

Author: Gaabriel Julien

ABSTRACT

One principal objective of inclusive education is to educate students in the mainstream classroom, thereby appreciating the diversity of all and recognizing their various contributions. An appropriate inclusive climate frequently embraces all and ensures that they are safe. It also motivates them to maximize their abilities. When inclusion is executed properly it fosters a more equitable society. It is a well-known fact that modern technology is swiftly altering teaching and learning, and the wide range of new tools and technologies makes it even more accessible to all people, including the disabled. Modern technology is instrumental in supporting inclusive education and incorporates all students. The positive effects of technology depend solely on how it is applied during teaching and learning, and leaders are pivotal in ensuring that this process is achieved. While there is no concrete formula for creating inclusive classrooms, educational leaders are free to use their approach to genuinely create inclusion.

Keywords: Inclusive Education, Inclusion, Leaders, Modern Technology, Disability, Classroom, Environment.

REFERENCES

  • Abiño, J., Agnote, S., Canon, J., Casin, M., Pequit, C., Solomon, M., & Ablen, Ph.D., A. S. (2019). Using Powerpoint Presentation for Classroom Instruction among Grade Ten Students: Towards A Guide. Ascendens Asia Singapore – Bestlink College of the Philippines. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/aasgbcpjmra/article/view/1153
  • Anderson, G. (2020). Accessibility Suffers During Pandemic Students with disabilities and their advocates say access to equitable education has been abandoned in the scramble to move classes online. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/06/remote-learning-shift-leaves-students-disabilities-behind
  • Ansley, B. M., Blinder, M., Demere, J., Varjas, K., Benson, G., & Ogletree, S. L. (2019). School Personnel and Leadership Collaboration Model for Ideal Work Contexts. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 189-201.
  • Arina, Y., Revita, Y., Gistituati, N., & Rusdinal, R. (2023). The Influence of Principals Participative Leadership Style and Work Climate on Public Middle School Teacher Performance. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan. 4(3).
  • Azorín, C., & Ainscow, M. (2018). Guiding schools on their journey towards inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1450900
  • Bartz, J. (2020). All-inclusive! Empirical insights into individual experiences of students with disabilities and mental disorders at German universities and implications for inclusive higher education. Education Sciences, 10(9), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090223
  • Black, R. D., Weinberg, L. A., & Brodwin, M. G. (2015). Universal Design for Learning and instruction: Perspectives of students with disabilities in higher education. Exceptionality Education International, 25(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v25i2.7723
  • Bloom, B. S. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (2). David McKay, New York, NY.
  • Bose, B., & Heymann, J. (2020). Do inclusive education laws improve primary schooling among children with disabilities? International Journal of Educational Development, (77), 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102208
  • Burgstahler, B. (2022). Leveling the playing field for students with disabilities in online opportunities. In M. Bonous-Hammarth (Eds.), Bridging marginality through inclusive higher education. neighborhoods, communities, and urban marginality (pp. 235–250). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8000-7_11
  • Campbell, J., Gilmore, L., & Cuskelly, M. (2003). Changing student teachers’ attitudes towards disability and inclusion. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28(4), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250310001616407
  • Carstens, K. J., Mallon, J. M., Bataineh, M., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2021). Effects of technology on student learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 20(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1290791.pdf
  • Chambers, D. (2020). Assistive Technology Supporting Inclusive Education: Existing and Emerging Trends. Chambers, D. (Ed.) Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education (International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, Vol. 14), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620200000014001
  • Cook, L., Rumrill, P. D., & Tankersley, M. (2009). Priorities and understanding of faculty members regarding college students with disabilities. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 84–96. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/ijtlhe567.pdf
  • Corbett, T., Dumareq, C., & Tommasini, J. (2021). Inclusive practices in educational institutions. Journal of Special Education, 1(6), 2-6.
  • Dalton, E. M. (2017). Universal Design for Learning: Guiding Principles to reduce barriers to Digital & Media Literacy Competence. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(2), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-2019-09-02-02
  • DeMatthews, D., Billingsley, B., McLeskey, J. & Sharma, U. (2020), Principal leadership for students with disabilities in effective inclusive schools, Journal of Educational Administration, (58)5. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2019-0177
  • Dignath, C., Rimm-Kaufman, S., van Ewijk, R. et al. (2022). Teachers’ Beliefs About Inclusive Education and Insights on What Contributes to Those Beliefs: A Meta-analytical Study. Educational Psychological Review, (34), 2609-2660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09695-0
  • Eliyana, A., & Ma’arif, S. (2019). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment affect the Transformational Leadership towards employee performance. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(3), 144-150.
  • Evers, C. J. R. (2011). A relational study of elementary principals’ leadership traits, teacher morale, and school performance. The University of Southern Mississippi.
  • Fichten, C. S., Ferraro, V., Asuncion, J. V., Chwojka, C., Barile, M., Nguyen, M., N., Klomp, R., & Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-learning problems and solutions: An exploratory study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 241–256. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bpOvlrQLZ2D7TRQQqADi-EQ4QZNcfMdj/view
  • Foster, C. B. (2020). The Importance of Inclusive Education. https://www.graduateprogram.org/2020/04/the-importance-of-inclusive-education/
  • Francis, G. L., Lavin, C. E., Sanchez, J., Reed, A. S., & Mason, L. (2021). Inclusive education definitions and practices: Exploring perspectives of education professionals in Mexico City. Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 18(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12356
  • Fuentes, M. A., Zelaya, D. G., & Madsen, J. W. (2021). Rethinking the Course Syllabus: Considerations for Promoting Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. Teaching of Psychology, 48(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959979
  • Garrett, R., Simunich, B., Legon, R., & Fredericksen, E. E. (2021). CHLOE 6: Online learning leaders adapt for a post-pandemic world. Quality Matters & Encoura. https://www.qualitymatters.org//sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Eduventures-CHLOE-6-Report-2021.pdf
  • Germano, W., & Nicholls, K. (2020). Syllabus: The remarkable, unremarkable document that changes everything. Princeton University Press.
  • Gladhart, M. A. (2010). Determining faculty needs for delivering accessible electronically delivered instruction in higher education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22(3), 185-196. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ906692.pdf
  • Gregory, J. (2018). Not my responsibility: The impact of separate special education systems on educators’ attitudes toward inclusion. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(1), 127-148.
  • Guan, N., Song, J., & Li, D. (2018). On the advantages of computer multimedia-aided English teaching. Procedia computer science, 131, 727-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.317
  • Harris, P. S., Gould, R., & Mullin, C. (2019). ADA research brief: Higher education and the ADA (pp. 1-6). ADA National Network Knowledge Translation Center.
  • Harris, B. N., McCarthy, P. C., Wright, A. M., Schutz, H., Boersma, K. S., Shepherd, S. L., Manning, L. A., Malisch, J. L., & Ellington, R. M. (2020). From panic to pedagogy: Using online active learning to promote inclusive instruction in ecology and evolutionary biology courses and beyond. Ecology & Evolution, (20457758), 10(22), 12581-12612. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6915
  • Hooijer, E., Merwe, M. V. D., & Fourie, J. (2021). Symbolic Representations as Teachers Reflect on Inclusive Education in South Africa. African Journal of Teacher Education, 10(1), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v10i1.6549
  • Ismailov, M., Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Catering to inclusion and diversity with Universal Design for Learning in asynchronous online education: A self-determination theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819884
  • Izzo, M. V., Murray, A., & Novak, J. (2008). The faculty perspective on Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21(2), 60-72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ822094.pdf
  • Kelly, K. (2014). Fostering inclusion with Universal Design for Learning. Association of American Colleges & Universities, 17(4), 3-5.
  • Kent, M. (2016). Access and barriers to online education for people with disabilities. National Center for Student Equity in Higher Education. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/55588/55669.pdf
  • Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Johnstone, C. (2006). Accommodations and Universal Design: Supporting access to assessments in higher education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 163-172. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ844632.pdf
  • Kibet, M. J., Kindiki, J. N., Sang, J. K., & Kitilit, J. K. (2012). Principal leadership and its impact on student discipline in Kenyan secondary schools: a case of Koibatek district.
  • Kielblock, S. (2018). Inclusive education for all: Development of an instrument to measure the teachers’ attitudes.
  • King-Sears, M. E., Stefanidis, A., Evmenova, A. S., Rao, K., Mergen, R. L., Owen, L. S., & Strimel, M. M. (2023). Achievement of learners receiving UDL instruction: A meta-analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103956
  • Kurt, S. (2018). ADDIE Model: Instructional Design. https://educationaltechnology.net/the-addie-model-instructional-design/
  • Linder, K. E., Fontaine-Rainen, D. L., & Behling, K. (2015). Whose job, is it? Key challenges and future directions for online accessibility in US institutions of higher education. Open Learning, 30(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1007859
  • Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Snelson, C., & Trespalacios, J. (2023). Higher Education Leaders’ Perspectives of Accessible and Inclusive Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2141608
  • Lomellini, A., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2022). Inclusive online courses: Universal Design for Learning strategies for faculty buy-in. In J. E. Stefaniak and R. Reese (Eds.), The instructional designer’s training guide: Authentic practices and considerations for mentoring ID and ed tech professionals (pp. 101-111). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109938-11
  • Liou, Y. H., Canrinus, E. T., & Daly, A. J. (2019). Activating the implementers: The role of organizational expectations, teacher beliefs, and motivation in bringing about reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, (79), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.004
  • Mag, A., G., Sinfield, S., & Burns, T. (2017). The benefits of inclusive education: new challenges for university teachers. MATEC Web of Conferences 121 https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712112011
  • Mahoney, J., & Carol, H. (2017). Using technology to differentiate and accommodate students with disabilities. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(5), 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017751517
  • Makwana, G. (2022). The Concept of Inclusive Education in India. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362546631_The_Concept_of_Inclusive_Education_in_India
  • Malik, M. (2021). A phenomenological study regarding the effects of leadership styles on perceived teacher morale and work performance at a charter school (Order No. 28412084). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2549678492).
  • Marion, H. (2020). Technology for inclusion. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373655
  • McAndrew, P., Farrow, R., & Cooper, M. (2012). Adapting online learning resources for all: Planning for professionalism in accessibility. Research in Learning Technology, 20(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18699
  • McNicholl, A., Casey, H., Desmond, D., & Gallagher, P. (2021). The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review. Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1642395
  • Moore, C. S., Brantmeir, E., & Brocheild, A. (2017). Inclusion by design: Tool helps faculty examine their teaching practice. Faculty Focus: Higher Education Teaching Strategies. Magna Publications.
  • Mutia, R., Niswanto, N., & Yusrizal, Y. (2021). The Effects of School Principals’ Leadership Style, Work Motivation, and Work Discipline on Teacher Pedagogical Competencies. LISHLAH: Journal Pendidikan. 13(2).
  • Nieminen, J. H., & Pesonen, H., V. (2019). Taking Universal Design back to its roots: Perspectives on accessibility and identity in undergraduate Mathematics. Education Sciences, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010012
  • Nilholm, C. (2020). Research about inclusive education in 2020 – How can we improve our theories in order to change practice? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(3), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1754547
  • Nurdyansyah, N., By Arifin, M. B. U., Astutik, I. R. I., Rais, P. (2022). Online Inclusive School: A Technological Break in Inclusive Education during the COVID-19 Period. Jurnal Kependidikan. 8(4), 806-816. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v8i4.5995
  • Oh-Young, C., & Filler, J. (2015). A meta-analysis of the effects of placement on academic and social skill outcome measures of students with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, (47) 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.08.014
  • Olley, R. (2021). A focused literature review of power and influence leadership theories. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management. 16(2).
  • Oyelere, S. S., Silveira, I. F., Martins, V. F., Eliseo, M. A., Akyar, Ö. Y., Costas Jauregui, V., & Tomczyk, Ł. (2020). Digital Storytelling and Blockchain as Pedagogy and Technology to Support the Development of an Inclusive Smart Learning Ecosystem. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S., Orovic, I., Moreira, F. (eds) Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 11(61). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45697-9_39
  • Payà, A. (2020). Inclusive and Special Education Policies in South America. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1030
  • Pedaste, M., Leijen, Ä., Kivirand, T., Nelis, P., & Malva, L. (2021). School leaders’ vision is the strongest predictor of their attitudes towards inclusive education practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(8), 1503-1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1994661
  • Puga, R. U. (2022). Game-based learning. A tool that enhances collaborative work: A case study of undergraduate students. Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning, 1, 570-577. https://doi.org/10.34190/ecgbl.16.1.419
  • Roberts, K. D., Park, H. J., Brown, S., & Cook, B. (2011). Universal Design for Instruction in Postsecondary Education: A Systematic Review of Empirically Based Articles. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 5–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941728.pdf
  • Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology. 53(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
  • Saputra, F. (2021). Leadership, communication, and work motivation in determining the success of professional organizations. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 1(2), 59-70.
  • Sarrett, J. C. (2017). Autism and accommodations in higher education: Insights from the Autism community. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48, 679-693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3353-4
  • Satterfield, D., Lepage, C., & Ladjahasan, N. (2015). Preferences for online course delivery methods in higher education for students with autism spectrum disorders. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 3651-3656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.758
  • Savolainen, H., Malinen, O. P., & Schwab, S. (2020). Teacher efficacy predicts teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion – a longitudinal cross-lagged analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(9), 958-972. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1752826
  • Schelly, C. L., Davies, P. L., & Spooner, C. L. (2011). Student perceptions of faculty implementation of Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24(1), 17–30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ941729.pdf
  • Seale, J. (2020). Improving accessible digital practices in higher education: Challenges and new practices for inclusion. Springer Nature.
  • Singleton, K., Evmenova, A., Jerome, M., K., & Clark, K. (2019). Integrating UDL strategies into the online course development process. Online Learning, 23(1), 206-235. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1407
  • Sivaruban, S. (2021).  A Critical Perspective of Leadership Theories. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(1).
  • Skaalvik, E.M., Skaalvik, S. (2017). Dimensions of teacher burnout: relations with potential stressors at school. Social Psychology of Education (20) 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9391-0
  • Snow, N., Hickey, N., Blom, N., O’Mahony, L., & Mannix-McNamara, P. (2021). An exploration of leadership in post-primary schools: The emergence of toxic leadership. Societies, 11(2), 54.
  • UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for action on special needs education. Salamanca, Spain, 7-10 June 1994.
  • UNESCO (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Paris. https://doi.org/10.54675/MHHZ2237
  • United Nations (2017). Toolkit on disability for Africa. Inclusive Education. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/disability/Toolkit/Inclusive-Education.pdf
  • Utami, P. P., & Vioreza, N. (2021). Teacher Work Productivity in Senior High School. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 599-614.
  • Westine, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Casto, A., Okraski, C., Park, G., Person, J., & Steele, L. (2019). Familiarity, current use, and interest in Universal Design for Learning among online university instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4258
  • Westwood, P. (2018). Inclusive and adaptive teaching: Meeting the challenge of diversity in the classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351061261
  • Xie, J., Rice, M. F. (2021). Professional and social investment in universal design for learning in higher education: Insights from a faculty development programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 886-900. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1827372
  • Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & Gao, F. (2023). The Dark and bright side of laissez-faire leadership: Does subordinates’ goal orientation make a difference? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1077357.